- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 18:59, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- NetQuake (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
is it notable? i think it isn't Melaen (talk) 19:11, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I was unable to find any reliable sources that discuss this "cyber attack" in depth. Cullen328 (talk) 01:53, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:01, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:03, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Zero google hits for "NetQuake Attack". The description given is so vague as to be of almost any attack at all. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 02:22, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Comparison of user page to article strongly suggests this is just something a kid did one day and wanted to brag about it. Wickedjacob (talk) 04:11, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.