- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) v/r - TP 12:27, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- NetResult (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
One single mention in a BBC article. A google search gives few relevant hits. PaoloNapolitano (talk) 17:43, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:11, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, the company seems to be a big player an important area of the internet (copyright policing), which will be historically relevant. There is an article about the companies activities in The Sunday Telegraph ([1]) and an interview with the companies president about his work in paidContent:UK ([2]), an article with some stuff on them in The Guardian ([3]). There is an article at FootballMedia.com ([4]), which does seem a bit sketchy reliable-sources wise but according to their about page authors are paid. And there are other dubious sources like court documents, and press releases, but they might be useful. jorgenev 00:09, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Jorgenev's refs are good. Szzuk (talk) 21:52, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Per Jorgenev, also there seem to be a number of good sources on Google News Archive--certainly enough to satisfy WP:CORP. Qrsdogg (talk) 18:01, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.