- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. The rationale for deletion is the least convincing nomination I've seen. Elkman (Elkspeak) 16:04, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Net Authority (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
dis site be gone yo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Habanero-tan (talk • contribs) 19:47, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- So? -- Fullstop (talk) 19:52, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- IT BE GONE! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Habanero-tan (talk • contribs) 19:53, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep Per WP:NTEMP Notability is not temporary. LegoTech·(t)·(c) 20:01, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep Weak assertations of notability, but they're there. And a trout to the nom as well. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 20:12, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Aye, keep since the nom couldn't provide a rationale for my "So?" If death were a reason to delete, WP wouldn't have an article on goatse, :) nor would we have biographies on dead people. -- Fullstop (talk) 20:44, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep Worst AfD nom I've ever seen, read this before you make any more nominations please. Beeblbrox (talk) 21:08, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep, no rationale for deletion presented. Nominator does seem to have the capability of valid participation in AFDs per contribs, so I don't know what the explanation is. --Dhartung | Talk 23:25, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep dis site be notable yo. Upon further thought, this AfD nom looks like a joke. AcroX 00:14, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep. No deletion rationale, subject is reasonably notable. I advise the nominator to familiarise themselves with deletion policy. WilliamH (talk) 08:57, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep. How many times must it be said? Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 15:51, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.