Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Net satisfaction index

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 07:18, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Net satisfaction index (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

A bit of a funny one this - everyone's familiar with the idea, and it may be a perfectly valid term for the concept (although I've a degree in economics & have never come across the term), and if it is it probably is more than a dicdef and just needs sourcing, but I'm having such trouble finding valid sources for it, taking the extreme option of bringing it here for a second opinion. Untouched for well over two months, so we can assume the creator's not going to improve it. Also, it seems the kind of thing that's probably already lurking here under another name, if anyone can think of something suitable to redirect it to - Market research maybe? — iridescenti (talk to me!) 00:17, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, tag, and wait a bit http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Net+Satisfaction+Index%22+site%3A.edu&btnG=Google+Search. --Remi 00:22, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's had two and a half months already — how long do you propose to give it? — iridescenti (talk to me!) 00:29, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Once it is properly tagged then 2, perhaps, 3 more months, then maybe delete. Citation + expert needed templates have been added. --Remi 05:34, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, sufficiently covered by customer satisfaction. This is just one way to measure it, and Wikipedia is not a business manual. --Dhartung | Talk 05:11, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Dhartung ~ G1ggy! _{...chatterbox...} 10:17, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Dhartung. This makes two econ majors that have never heard of the term. Mystache 16:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete That this is the only article to the author's credit makes me believe someone had a not necessarily good faith agenda in creating this article. --Infrangible 02:43, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.