Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Netism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Taraneh Javanbakht. MBisanz ^talk 02:21, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Netism

Unable to find any significant independent coverage of the topic in reliable sources. Raamin (talk) 21:41, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Taraneh Javanbakht, whose philosophy this appears to be. Mandsford (talk) 22:09, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/redirect – in the policy of AGF, in that I could not find any references and must believe the ones listed in the piece. ShoesssS ^Talk 22:18, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Merge to the extent possible. No redirect, as this term is not substantiated in English, and has other uses, such as: "any confusing statement about the Internet or its underlying technology." --Bejnar (talk) 23:04, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge Neologism notable in context of this person's biography. ChildofMidnight (talk) 00:23, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Neologism that has no independent notability. Note that all usable content in Netism is also present in the Taraneh Javanbakht article, and since it was added to the two articles by the same user User:Zohairani (see diff), there is no reason to preserve Netism as a redirect in order to comply with GFDL. Abecedare (talk) 22:02, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:59, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.