- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. TigerShark 08:40, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article is an advertisement, and if the advertising component were removed there would be nothing salvageable left behind. Do you think the company is notable? Richardcavell 23:05, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral >10k G-hits. I don't feel like going through and verifying each one's relevancy. Morgan Wick 23:45, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete 3 Google News hits, one a press release and only mentioned briefly in the other two. Recury 01:03, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Certainly a more notable, long-term presence in this emerging space than others that are mentioned far more frequently in Wikipedia. Richard, not sure how you see this as an adverisement when it is factual. What is your opinion of the many Streamload *articles* on Wikipedia for example? Current Google hits include mentions from ecommercetimes.com, LinuxInsider, Processor.com, World Oil and others. mreagan 01:03, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - clearly an advert.--Runcorn 10:08, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Unsourced POV. Fails WP:CORP. BlueValour 20:39, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.