- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 22:06, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is buzzword-based spam, and poorly worded to boot. If the term refers to something real and notable, this gibberish doesn't express it. Calbaer 18:40, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. It seems it may have been used once or twice, but doesn't seem to be a widely accepted or even particularly useful term. In the event of it being kept a rewrite is definately needed. Artw 20:22, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Artw, Please see my personal message to you concerning the rewrite in progress. Jthomp4338 21:39, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The department of education may have coined the word, but I'm pretty sure the reference didn't involve "spacetime" or the "ever-expanding collective intelligence of Human Knowledge Bifurcation". This is creepy original research of a neologism. --Xrblsnggt 02:32, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete OR, or at least not noteable, and that's putting it kindly. I googled it, and was unable to find any usage of the word in the sense the article refers to .WolfKeeper 21:54, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.