Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Netronome

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 12:38, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Netronome

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Netronome (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NCORP. No WP:SIGCOV in independent, reputable sources. Article hasn't been updated in years. Only mention of "Metronome" in scholarly literature is when talking about its products, nothing about the company itself. TurboSuperA+_(talk) 10:04, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. TurboSuperA+_(talk) 10:04, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Pennsylvania. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:53, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Suriname0 (talk) 17:55, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Seeing passing mentions, but nothing too substantive for the high standard of WP:NCORP. The best I found are: [1] [2] It would not surprise me if this does meet WP:GNG, I'm seeing a lot of hits on Google Scholar and Books, although as the nom says many of these are in the context of discussing specific products. Cheers, Suriname0 (talk) 18:19, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.