Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neurodisc Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 02:24, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Neurodisc Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced stub on what appears to be a non notable record company.Does not assert its importance and notability. Distinct lack of solid sources. ‡ Himalayan ‡ ^ΨMonastery 22:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:45, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:45, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this record label. Joe Chill (talk) 15:39, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Basically sourceless, delete per nom. --Bejnar (talk) 02:08, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.