- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 13:23, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Neuron Games (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete per WP:CORPDEPTH. The article has five references. References 1, 3, and 4 are promotional and not independent of the subject. Reference 2 (PC Magazine May 2002) is problematic. No page number or article title is given. In fact, there were two issues of PC Magazine published in May 2002 [1]. So which one was it? I’ve looked at both issues online and could not find any mention of Neuron Games, but I cannot rule out a brief mention. (Another possibility is that the reference is plain wrong.) Reference 5 (GamePro Magazine Jan. 2003) does not supply page number or article title, and it was not available to me online. This reference is used to support a claim about a game that already has its own article. It does not seem that the reference (assuming the reference is correct) is in-depth coverage of the company itself. I have also done a Google News archive search on Neuron Games and found very little—a couple of interviews in blogs, and a passing mention in a local newspaper [2]. Logical Cowboy (talk) 04:11, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Not notable in context. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iconoclast.horizon (talk • contribs)
- Delete per Logical Cowboy's excellent research. --MelanieN (talk) 02:03, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.