Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neutra VDL Studio and Residences
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Elockid (Talk) 16:24, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutra VDL Studio and Residences (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete Non-notable and over coverage; promotion Pablo.hablo (talk) 10:08, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]Delete--Charmdaisy (talk) 14:19, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]- Keep That this is on the NHRP overrides the claims of these "two new editors" who support each others claims. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:56, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Definitely notable. Well written and well referenced article that should be kept.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 15:29, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 March 15. Snotbot t • c » 10:30, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- CU comment: Socks be blocked. Elockid (Talk) 16:02, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Can we close this discussion, since the only proponents of deletion were the two WP:Socks? 7&6=thirteen (☎) 16:11, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.