Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neutral point of view
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. Luigi30 (Ταλκ) 02:01, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
At best a reiteration of what's already at WP:NPOV; nothing to merge. Recommend redirecting. Stifle 21:17, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. As indicated on discussion page, used to be a redirect, but should be a separate neutral article (i.e. a neutral article about the neutral point of view, where WP:NPOV by nature has to be advocacy.) Fool 21:25, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
"Keep. The article is about NPOV in general, while WP:NPOV is about how NPOV specifically relates to Wikipedia. -- Saikiri~ 23:17, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as Wikipedia isn't everything. WP:NPOV is an interpretation of Neutral point of view as it is applied to Wikipedia. This article has validity. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 00:50, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Valid topic. Herostratus 04:07, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, important to have an encyclopedia entry on exactly NPOV is. --Thephotoman 00:43, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. An example why this article is useful: we need to have something to link to when we say a newspaper takes a neutral stance. jareha 03:00, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Question. Is the term "neutral point of view" actually used outside of Wikipedia? If not, this term is non-notable. -- SCZenz 06:32, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, it definitely is. Google found plenty of non-Wikipedia references for the concept. jareha 07:35, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.