- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Neutrogena. Spartaz Humbug! 19:21, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutrogena Wave (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is a product with no published sources, it was once tagged for speedy deletion per G11, but I contested it because it doesn't look like the advertising was blatant. In my opinion, I think this article should be deleted, as this does not meet notability guideline for products, but if this article does fit one of the criteria for speedy deletion, then I apologise for removing the speedy deletion template. Minimac (talk) 18:45, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteRedirect to Neutrogena - non-notable facial cleanser. TJRC (talk) 19:03, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]- Redirect to Neutrogena. Erpert (let's talk about it) 19:31, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Neutrogena seems most appropriate here. Aditya Ex Machina 20:18, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.