- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 01:31, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Nidhi Subbaiah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
"Upcoming actress" = WP:CRYSTALBALL violation. Biruitorul Talk 02:46, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- She's upcoming, therefore she's not notable. Delete. Alexius08 (talk) 06:00, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Upcoming actress means non-notable. Schuym1 (talk) 08:48, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:05, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep. Removed hyperbole. Cleaned up article. Still needs more sourcing. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 16:42, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No claim of notability, unsupported claims ("received quite a lot of attention from nationwide audiences"). Vanity article. Bongomatic (talk) 06:54, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:44, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.