- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 07:45, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Nigel Hopkins (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Speedy deletion was declined on the basis that the article asserts some claims to notability. I have, however, been unable to find any reliable sources that indicate that subject meets the criteria for inclusion, therefore this appears to fail WP:MUSIC. I'd welcome your thoughts on this. sparkl!sm hey! 15:11, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —sparkl!sm hey! 15:14, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:25, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisting comment. The article is a BLP so a second relist is reasonable. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:27, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete the included sources mention Hopkins in passing (eg, "and on keyboard, Nigel Hopkins"). NN due to lack of media attention. Josh Parris 01:49, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.