Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nijananda sampradaya

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Pranami Sampraday. Michig (talk) 07:33, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nijananda sampradaya

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem notable. Google search returns about 3,000 results. Thegreatgrabber (talk) 02:59, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete due to a lack of third party sources. Cannot meet the WP:GNG. Vcessayist (talk) 00:19, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think that the number of hits from a web search is a good metric for evaluating the notability of a long-established South Asian religious sect/community. For that kind of subject books are the place to look for coverage. A more common spelling seems to be Nijanand Sampradaya, with some sources found by that search giving the alternate name "Pranami", about which we already have an article, so redirect. Phil Bridger (talk) 15:45, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Anbu121 (talk me) 21:54, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect Phil Bridger's input as to a Redirect to Pranami is persuasive. (Parenthetically, none of this content would seem to merit porting over.) FeatherPluma (talk) 17:36, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. Anbu121 (talk me) 21:54, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.