Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikhil ravishankar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NW (Talk) 20:17, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nikhil ravishankar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Claims to be a 12 year old scrabble champion but no indication of this on Google. The reference is to a page under construction. noq (talk) 10:21, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• userfy and strip article accouterments. This was created by a user with the same name, so could be a user page. Leave no redirect. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:28, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 13:17, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 13:17, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or userfy is fine. I can't find supporting documentation for the claims. Hobit (talk) 14:20, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Could not find any references.--Deepak D'Souza (talk) 14:38, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Fails WP:BIO. Joe Chill (talk) 02:03, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:BIO. Wikipedia is not one's personal webspace. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 03:05, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:BIO. Warrah (talk) 02:55, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.