- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete, nimblofully. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 03:45, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Protologism, one google hit, deprodded. Weregerbil 10:12, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination, non-notable unverifiable unstable neologism, i.e. protologism. Closest related word is nimblicity, but that's a trademarked protologism anyway. —Quarl (talk) 2006-06-24 10:26Z
- Delete Fails WP:NEO/WP:HOAX. Clearly the hoaxer has never seen a real dictionary in their life. --DaveG12345 10:31, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete per nom. Tevildo 11:09, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails WP:NEO. --Coredesat 20:54, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, quickly and fast ~ trialsanderrors 00:18, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete under WP:NEO guidelines. --Arnzy (whats up?) 01:35, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NEO Gimme danger 19:12, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.