- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:05, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Ninja Cop (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Prod was removed. This film fails WP:NF and is obviously self-promotion (look at the username of the page's creator). POKERdance talk/contribs 00:35, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: A non-notable home-made film. Joe Chill (talk) 01:11, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Homemade movie, doesn't fall within WP:NF. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 01:23, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn. JJL (talk) 01:42, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete although it may be a Nice film it is just not notable enough.Dr. Szląchski (talk) 03:45, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable. Hairhorn (talk) 05:13, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Ninja delete. JBsupreme (talk) 08:17, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - tagged for speedy, called on WP:SNOW. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 19:45, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- ...aaaand speedy was rejected. OK, we'll let this run. =^_^= --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 02:07, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.