Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nishant S Mehta

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 23:03, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nishant S Mehta

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Nishant S Mehta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the general notability guideline, basic criteria for people, and criteria for biographies (awards are not sufficiently well-known or notable, nor does the record confer notability). The subject is in the dubious "sweet spot" between having a marginal credible claim to significance and not being purely promotional (though it certainly tries), hence being ineligible for the A7 or G11 speedy deletion criteria. (I have declined to use proposed deletion because it is a newly-created article and thus would expect "opposition to the deletion"). Sources either do not have significant coverage or are regurgitated press releases (non-independent sources). Sdrqaz (talk) 22:26, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Sdrqaz (talk) 22:26, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:41, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: per nom. Lacks WP:SIGCOV in independent reliable sources. Ab207 (talk) 06:19, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Simply being related to notable companies, films, events etc doesn't qualify notability guidelines. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 17:20, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Fails WP:GNG, and most likely UPE/COI editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:52, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.