- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was merge and redirect to Book of Nehemiah. – Alphax τεχ 07:39, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-Notable (Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information), the name only appears one time (in passing, no less) in the scriptures. I can't imagine how the stub will ever expanded.--WilliamThweatt 03:36, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep or merge with Book of Nehemiah. A one-time Biblical character would almost certainly be more notable than an episode of the Simpsons; there's gotta be some kind of secondary literature out there somewhere. If not, just merge/redirect it. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 05:15, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Book of Nehemiah, just to give the benefit of the doubt. --Icarus 07:45, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per the Canadian. --Eivindt@c 12:24, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge Too brief of mention to warrant entire article StuffOfInterest 18:44, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with Book of Nehemiah per above. --Bachrach44 19:03, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with Book of Nehemiah --JBJ 20:37, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with Book of Nehemiah per above. While CanadianCaesar makes a valid point about secondary sources, I am skeptical such information exists. If additional credible sources of information emerge worthy of a separate entry, then perhaps the issue can be revisited... --Folajimi 13:30, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.