Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nobscot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:30, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nobscot

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable independent sources for notability. Two minor awards, and a great deal of publicity from press releases. (some of the references are even from prweb) The most substantial item, in entrepreneur.com, is written by the co-founder of the company. DGG ( talk ) 23:32, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I see scads of press releases and a couple stories in Honolulu Star-Advertiser which is local coverage and therefore not helpful for notability. WP:TNT, start over at future date if better stuff exists. ☆ Bri (talk) 00:37, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 04:36, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hawaii-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 04:36, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and Bri. This has long been maintained by a COI account--possibly paid--and bears the public relations scars to prove it. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:25, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom - no independant RS for this. Deathlibrarian (talk) 07:12, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.