- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Edokter • Talk • 19:28, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Prod removed without comment, so doing an AfD. This is just another cellular phone model with no specific claim to notability; it doesn't have an interesting history, wasn't a design that changed the market, and is not notable in a very competitive and crowded field. The article has no references other than reviews, which aren't substantial. Mikeblas 04:57, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I don't understand how any of these get a page - is every product from every manufacturer notable? Wikipedia is not a catalog, and this entry is not encyclopedic. MarkBul 05:07, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment After this AfD, it might be useful for the nominator (if the result is delete) to go through the Nokia mobile phones category, because there are a lot of articles like the one nominated. --tgheretford (talk) 08:41, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- DeleteFails WP:N by lack of substantial coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources. Wikipedia is not a Nokia catalog. Edison 05:22, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge – Instead of deleting, this article should be merged into Nokia Xpress Music, along with the 5210 and 5300. —TigerK 69 19:39, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.