Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Non-conjunctive Analysis (UKCAT)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  06:20, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-conjunctive Analysis (UKCAT) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a section in UKCAT. XfD because I doubt notability Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 15:25, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 17:14, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: As and per nom. Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 15:03, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Simply not notable. It warrants one sentence in the UKCAT article and no redirect. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:54, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Agree with RHaworth. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 16:16, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.