Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Non-invasive ultrasonic removal
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Michig (talk) 21:56, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Non-invasive ultrasonic removal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
appears to be essentially an advertisement for a particular method of liposuction DGG ( talk ) 02:28, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Agree that this is basically an ad added by a SPA. An earlier version of the same article was Speedily Deleted when, after it was nominated for deletion, the creator blanked the page[1]. There do not appear to be any reliable, independent, third party WP:MEDRS compliant sources whatsoever. Fladrif (talk) 02:50, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The article is hopelessly out of date (the method "will be presented" at a meeting in 2007) and the references are inadequate and in some cases deceptive. The most impressive looking reference, from BBC News, is not even about this noninvasive technique; it is about using ultrasound in connection with liposuction. The only other mainstream independent reference, from Business Week, is 10 years old. If this procedure hasn't become more notable in 10 years, it doesn't belong here. --MelanieN (talk) 17:06, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The sources fail to advance a strong degree of notability considering the limited lasting consequences. Mkdwtalk 21:10, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.