Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nonlocality Myths Explained
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was article sent to Wikipedia:Copyright problems. howcheng [ t • c • w • e ] 21:59, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Article is a self-promoting advert for a webpage of original research --Bob Mellish 16:40, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Sirs,
On consideration, I realise that I have misinterpreted the Wikipedia policy, and am attempting to remove my references. I apologise for any inconvenience I may have caused.
Should you be in a position to suggest an alternative method of listing or linking my article, I should very much appreciate that.
Thank you for your kind co-operation, and
Yours faithfully,
Richard Treacy for Professor Peter Treacy, Canberra Australia.
- Delete. Ad for original research. Nonlocality already has an article. --Nsevs 17:16, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nomination. —Preost talk contribs 18:16, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete OR. ManoaChild 21:30, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.