Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nordic R1a Y-DNA Project
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 03:34, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Nordic R1a Y-DNA Project (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This seems to be an attempt to conduct an original research project through a WP article. That is so not what WP is. RebekahThorn (talk) 19:35, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable, no evidence of significance or impact beyond just another DNA project on the FTDNA website. Jheald (talk) 19:55, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete While the topic of Norwegian or Scandinavian R1a heteorgeneity may become a notable topic in time, I could find no secondary references for this project and the primary sources were discussion boards that are considered unreliable. Until this project publishes notable peer-reviewed results, this article is an example of WP:TOOSOON; it should be deleted, with an option to re-create once reliable secondary sources become available. Mark viking (talk) 22:45, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable. —Ed!(talk) 16:42, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 23:07, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 23:07, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I was unable to find significant coverage in reliable third-party sources Jebus989✰ 15:44, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.