- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was No consensus. CitiCat ♫ 04:15, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
May not be notable, seems to have some sources though h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 13:38, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Could you explain this a little further please ? I am currently searching for the other references I know exist, including a TV interview with the site principles.
What other references would be acceptable for a site which is brand new like this one ?
Pete —Preceding unsigned comment added by Guthroth (talk • contribs) 13:47, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies for not signing correctly Guthroth 13:50, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Can the author plead in this case ? The original article which was deleted earlier in teh week was written by someone with no Wikipedia experience. I have replaced that article and now shown references to the project in local and electronic media. An expansion will follow in a day or so. Guthroth 13:34, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, W.marsh 21:25, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.