Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norton level crossing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete both. Jayjg ^(talk) 03:17, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Norton level crossing

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete - I've cleaned up this article a little bit from its original incarnation, but I still don't feel its anywhere near notable enough for inclusion! It just seems to be a random level crossing, out of many hundreds we have in this country! Jeni ^(talk) 20:47, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: I've included Fenwick Level Crossing in this nomination, just about to tag the page. Jeni ^(talk) 20:50, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both: Fails WP:LOCAL, WP:TOWN, and WP:V. Obviously non-notable geographic feature. Cannot find any sources whatsoever per WP:GOOGLETEST. --Triadian (talk) 03:17, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both: there are (were) literally thousands of level crossings in the UK alone. Mention in an article about the line they are on is the most that is needed (usually by inclusion in a route diagram). Mjroots (talk) 08:28, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both: no sign of notability not different to thousands of other crossings in the UK. MilborneOne (talk) 10:41, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both. What next? An article about every railway bridge or signal box? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:09, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both, they might merit a mention in the article about the lines they are on or a list of level crossings in South Yorkshire but not full articles. Thryduulf (talk) 18:40, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both as NN -- There are thousands of places where railways cross roads or rivers, but we really do not need an article on every one: a level crossing is no more worthy of an artiucle than a bridge under or over a railway. A few will be notable, but this should be rare. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:51, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.