- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. — Scientizzle 16:43, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Monster lacks real world notability, cannot be cited with secondary reliable sources independent of the subject, no real world context can be established Pilotbob (talk) 21:45, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletions. -- Pilotbob (talk) 21:46, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as stub has no primary or secondary sources. Dungeons & Dragons articles should not be split and split again into ever more minutiae of detail treatment, with each split normally lowering the level of notability. --Gavin Collins (talk) 08:15, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.