Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nouveau Classical Evolution

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Nearly Headless Nick ^{C} 18:27, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nouveau Classical Evolution (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This is a single-artist art "movement" with no notability or references beyond the artist's own website. The language used is convoluted and nonsensical. Wikipedia should not be used for promotional purposes. Freshacconci 12:45, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. A google search reveals no hits at all, and the only reference aside from the artist's website, is a generic commercial art print site (with no indication of affiliation with or promotion of "Nouveau Classical Evolution"). Freshacconci 14:00, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no references or anything findable by Google -- Whpq 17:37, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Nouveau Classical Gibberish is more like it. Bus stop 22:32, 9 February 2007 (UTC) Bus stop 22:32, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. If there are no Google hits, you must dump the bits. Herostratus 03:01, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment This article links to a page called Clint_Wright. I don't think that page shows any references. I've nominated it for deletion. Bus stop 17:38, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.