- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the nomination was delete. Jaranda wat's sup 03:35, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Spam. Cheese Sandwich 01:48, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, de-adify, expand. Seems like a notable company (~90K GHits [1], partnership with Computer Associates, etc.) -- Grev 01:58, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- However, there appears to be a lot of unrelated Novarras in the Google results. --Cheese Sandwich 02:02, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. the vast majority of the relevant ghits are just press releases - the ability to get press-releases republished is not a criterion for notability. Also, in its current form, the article does nothing to assert the company's notabilty. Just describes the flagship product. This article meets WP:ADS far, far better than it meets WP:CORP -Seidenstud 05:56, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep and "de-adify" as Grev says. There's reasonable press coverage here. It's kinda borderline.--Chaser T 07:47, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, also nn company, fails WP:CORP for not having multiple non-trivial articles written by third parties. Per Seidenstud, coverage I checked were catalog listings and press releases of product. Tychocat 18:02, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - those who are saying 'seems like a notable company' should note that it is the software being featured here not the company. 19 GHits here indicate little interest in this browser. BlueValour 01:10, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.