- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedily deleted. --ST47Talk·Desk 20:43, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Nu Shejunshuj (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Original fiction as far as I can tell. -- RHaworth 03:18, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- DELETE. Totally non-existent, like those "memoirs" of dead Italian warlock boxers we sometimes get. Qworty 03:48, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. In-universe fiction, and I can't tell what universe it belongs in. (Neither the wikilink nor Google are helpful.) Zetawoof(ζ) 04:01, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Apparent in-universe fiction. Bart133 (t) (c) 04:08, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Appears to be a hoax. No sources. The article linked was also crated by the same user and also appears to be a hoax. --Hdt83 Chat 05:15, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I wouldn't go so far as to call it a "hoax". Inner Imen (currently tagged for speedy deletion) refers to the region as existing in "the world of Harim". I have no idea what fictional universe that's supposed to be a part of, though. Zetawoof(ζ) 06:14, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. *drew 09:19, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It's alright, I just wanted to prove to someone that people could write this out. You may delete it as soon as you can, seeing as I have NO idea how to do that. As for the extra link for Inner Imen, I made it because somehow the brackets appeared around the phrase, and I understood that was the only apparent problem. -Irken Trad 10:55, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Do you mean that you created the article just to make a point about how "easy" it is to create a bogus article on Wikipedia? That sounds like nothing more or less than trolling. Qworty 17:40, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. It was a juvenile mistake on my part, since I didn't really even think of how I would delete it afterward. I'm not a repeat offender, and this won't happen again. -Irken Trad 19:13, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as author requests deletion. So tagged. Irken, only admins can delete articles. Morgan Wick 19:01, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.