Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Numix

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wily D 09:03, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Numix

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

Non-notable; niche organization with little significant press coverage; unencyclopedic writing/format; only citation is to official website. Article creator has a COI (single-purpose account). Cloudchased (talk) 07:59, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:12, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:12, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Only references are self-published, article appears promotional in nature. Kindzmarauli (talk) 14:30, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm a Numix Project member. One Numix user made this page yesterday, so we just edited it to fit Wikipedia rules, adding more press articles and deleting unencyclopedic format. We hope it's fine now. Thanks you! Paolo Rotolo (talk) 13:25, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Hi, Paolo. Just to let you know for future reference, editing or creating your own organization's page is a conflict of interest WP:COI (if something is notable enough to be on Wikipedia, it usually ends up there), but since you just did copy editing and provided more sources, it shouldn't be much of an issue. Editors on this deletion will look at the sources and notability of Numix and determine the outcome of the deletion discussion. Upjav (talk) 23:36, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:11, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - software article of unclear notability lacking independent reliable source coverage. Current refs are only to dev's sites, blogs, and download sites, (WebUpd8 is a blog, Softpedia is a download site) and are not useful in establishing notability.Dialectric (talk) 12:35, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Lacks notability and coverage, WP:TOOSOON. Upjav (talk) 00:03, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.