Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuspire Networks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. causa sui (talk) 04:14, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nuspire Networks

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of meeting WP:ORG. References given are almost entirely press releases and directory entries. noq (talk) 17:24, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 02:11, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Yet another Managed Security Services provider dedicated to designing and providing state-of-the-science network management and security solutions advertising on Wikipedia. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:18, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As the author of this article, I've added citing to an independent new source, the Detroit Free Press, and moved press releases from article body (citations) to external links. Trying to prove Notability WP:CORP without seeming like advertising can be a tricky line to walk. Looking for help to improve article. A GNews Search and general Google test should help prove WP:CORP, which shows being named one of the fastest-growing private companies in America in 2009 by Inc. (magazine). Being included in the Gartner Magic Quadrant is also significant because it's only a very select group of industry leaders that make it to this status. I am an industry expert, but am not affiliated with the company (Nuspire). Editing from a neutral point of view NPOV since I noticed Nuspire is the only member in the Gartner Magic Quadrant not included in Wikipedia. Please advise on how to improve and meet guidelines. Thank you! ProfessorJ9 (talk) 19:36, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Question I don't think the evidence shows sufficient notability for this small company, except for the possible Gartner Magic Quadrant. How many companies does it list for this sector? I don't think the report is accessible to me. I declined a speedy because the actual article is descriptive not promotional, no matter who wrote it. DGG ( talk ) 16:27, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Another company paying someone to list them on Wikipedia advertising on Wikipedia. - User:Cleanster 09:43, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.