- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Fram (talk) 09:16, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- OC Systems (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This page has been deleted as non-notable a number of times. The account creating it is clearly an employee of some sort and is running all over WP:COI. The page was initially moved to her userspace at User:Amyyaley/OC Systems to give her an attempt to clean it up for recreation, but this user is not aware on how these things work here (uses tildes in the commentspace). Maybe this can be speedied, but given the repetitive nature of this article's creation, I think it's worth considering a discussion, I guess. ju66l3r (talk) 16:38, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 17:26, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I concur with jubbler. All I can find are trivial mentions, primary sources, and press releases. Hence, no external demonstration of notability and no basis for an article. Sheffield Steeltalkstalk 18:38, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: Those are G's, not b's. Ju66l3r = 'juggler'. :) ju66l3r (talk) 05:48, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:19, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as referenced and coherent article, but make citations inline. Best, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 03:42, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.