- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. There's a consensus here for speedy deletion under G11: one direct request, and two additional ones saying they support it. That, along with the content of the article, is enough for me to be fine with deleting it under G11. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:03, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
- OFF3R (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
References point to niche non-notable blogs and press releases. A quick news search showed passing mentions at best. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 00:20, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Reads like an advertisement, makes me feel like it fails WP:PROMOTION as well as the GNG. Etzedek24 (Would it kill ya to leave an edit summary?) 01:33, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy delete (per G11) - subject appears to be somewhat covered in some sources so I'm unsure about GNG ([1]) but even then it would require a "fundamental rewrite" and a clean start would be the best option. 198.84.253.202 (talk) 02:12, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete (but would support speedy delete). This is a corporate brochure citing press releases.--Rpclod (talk) 02:52, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete agree with Rpclod SeraphWiki (talk) 03:00, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.