- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 01:10, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- ORBIT Systems (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject fails WP:CORP. Possible WP:COI issues, the originator of the has the same name as a company that ORBIT Systems owns, Voyageurit. If kept needs to be rewritten to sound less like an advertisement. CSD tags have been removed from the article twice. Click23 (talk) 16:59, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I was being completely open, using another ID to hide the affiliation would have been unethical. When deciding on the proposed affiliation we needed to evaluate the business opportunity implications of IT outsourcing in the small to midsized business market. I tried to write my article using this mindset which is a valid issue in the small business community which a large part of the economy. I will edit the article to make it less ORBIT specific but the issue at hand is still relevant and Wiki worthy. Voyageurit (talk) 21:26, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:30, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and salt, repeatedly re-created article about a non-consumer business with no showing of minimal importance and blatant advertising to boot: As the business climate continues to evolve and technology advancements continue, outsourcing of technology services will develop.... - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:01, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and salt per Smerdis above. B.Rossow talkcontr 18:05, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:51, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Summary of Article edited to demonstrate challenges facing the technology outsourcing industry. Voyageurit (talk) 16:25, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not a trace of notability. Mukadderat (talk) 22:57, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.