- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 05:02, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- OSTEM (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nonnotable single-referenced organization, no improvement since tagged August Staszek Lem (talk) 03:08, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:03, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 12:56, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I started my search with the group's full name but found nothing so I added oSTEM and received results here (brief mention for an event), here (president claims they had a two-year hiatus so that is probably to blame for the lack of attention), here (this provides better details such as the founder and another president) and here (this article focuses more with a group president talking about sexuality research and only briefly mentions the group). Although people are becoming more tolerant with the LGBT community, I believe this group is not notable at this time. As I mentioned earlier that their two-year hiatus may be to blame for the lack of attention but, considering nearly all of the news articles are from universities and oSTEM has hosted university meetings, the group is probably more based at universities rather than nationally or internationally known. SwisterTwister talk 21:39, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 01:08, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.