Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OTOXO Productions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 22:53, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OTOXO Productions

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG. Refbomb of brief mentions in blogs, self-published sources, programming announcements, etc.... but lacking significant coverage in reliable sources. Vrac (talk) 12:37, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:55, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:55, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:55, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: The term 'award winning' has now been removed from the article Johnotoxo (talk) 09:03, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 ^Talk 10:57, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - My searches found no evidence of better coverage. SwisterTwister talk 06:22, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ☮JAaron95 ^Talk 13:39, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- what a pain in the butt articles like this are, which simply slather on raw links to promotional fluff to make it appear notable. Sure this production company exists, sure it has output. But nothing here shows that they are notable, and searches turned up nothing either. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:06, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.