- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:55, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- OZONE (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Someone's personal hobby project. Not notable; mentioned once on osnews.com, where users can submit posts. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 22:55, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 23:17, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete agreed, might have been interesting in 1997, but seems like development stopped in 2004 and never became notable in the next 9 years. W Nowicki (talk) 16:07, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Vaporware is vapor. No reliable sources, article substantively unimproved in six years. (Come to that, much like the vaporware.) Ravenswing 04:12, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.