Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Object Oriented Quality Management

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. without prejudice to recreation if in due course the concept is accepted to the point where notability can be shown by significant coverage in independent sources. JohnCD (talk) 22:13, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Object Oriented Quality Management

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable neologism. All references in the article are to work by Peter van Nederpelt, who is also this article's author. It doesn't appear that anyone other than him has written about this topic, or at least not using this name. Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 02:46, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I dont understand this article, and it has multiple issues.--Written by GeneralCheese 03:09, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of references has been added. Please review the article for a second time. PNDT —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pndt (talk • contribs) 01:47, 6 February 2010 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: Pndt (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD. Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 02:50, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are references by people who are not you. There are references that use the phrase "Object Oriented Quality Management." Sadly, there are no references fitting both criteria. Have any unaffiliated writers covered your work? Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 02:50, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 09:19, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Res ipsa loquitur: An important concept of the OQM model is, that an organization and its environment can be decomposed in objects. These objects interact with each other and need to have a certain quality. Examples of these objects are: customers, products, services, processes, staff, information systems, housing, and suppliers. The name of the model is derived from this concept. Patent nonsense. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 23:37, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The model is new (2009). Therefore no unaffiliated writers are available (yet). Does this mean that there is no place for new developments (in business models in this case) in Wikipedia? If that is the case I have to wait a while and introduce the article later.Pndt (talk) 11:58, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, Wikpedia is generally unsuitable for brand new research. Only more established work that has been covered in secondary sources is normally accepted here, in order to avoid self-promotion etc. So, delete for now. Pcap ping 12:06, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This appears to be WP:OR due to being a concept not established in independent sources. Ash (talk) 22:49, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.