Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Objective Modula-2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Stifle (talk) 11:08, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Objective Modula-2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

An article consisting entirely of unverified information (not a single ref, no relevant informative Google hits) highly suspect of being original research. In addition, Google search results indicates non-notability. Article not substantially modified since 2005, and seems to describe an unfinished dead project. More details on article talk page. -- int19h (talk) 20:27, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: readers who clicked a link that leads here because they genuinely sought information about Objective Modula-2, please search for the offical home page of the project, contrary to opinions shown below, the project does exist and it is active. Website maintainers should fix their links and point to the official home page instead.
• Delete: Fails WP:N. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 20:33, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.

-- Fabrictramp (talk) 00:00, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per int19h. This appears to be a dead project that was never implemented. It's usually a bad sign when the Wikipedia article on something is its first Google hit. That suggests there is no mainstream recognition of the topic. EdJohnston (talk) 18:07, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not currently notable; looks like description of vaporware to me too. Plvekamp (talk) 06:03, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.