Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Objectivist theory of value (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Objectivism (Ayn Rand).  Sandstein  05:14, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Objectivist theory of value (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of Notability Karbinski (talk) 10:46, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I was wrong last time, as discussion of the Objectivist theory of value as a sub-topic of Objectivism is not widely covered in secondary sources. --Karbinski (talk) 11:09, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect works. --Karbinski (talk) 16:35, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete or redirect: Article's citations are entirely from Rand's works. Barring substantial impact outside of Objectivism, this does not deserve its own article, but should be dealt with in a subsection on the main Objectivism page. TallNapoleon (talk) 14:17, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Objectivism (Ayn Rand). This is a leftover relic of the days when there were separate articles on every aspect of Rand's ideas. Like this one, they were mostly primary-sourced description. A half-dozen others were merged/redirected into the main article on Objectivism. This article's descriptions of Rand's ethics and aesthetics are redundant to the main article, and there is not so much secondary source material as to demand a sub-article at this time. --RL0919 (talk) 18:37, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:48, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - Seems like a likely content fork of Objectivism, but I'm not a philosopher and don't play one on TV. Carrite (talk) 18:16, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:35, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Objectivism (Ayn Rand) as per RL0919's reasonings. —Tom Morris (talk) 12:43, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.