- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No need for AFD in cases like this. Friday (talk) 15:35, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Obstatunity (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable neologism
» \ / (⁂) 20:59, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete - per WP:A1 -Zeus-uc 21:01, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Non-notable neologism. Google turns up TWO uses on the whole of the internet, both by users of websites, not a single use in a published/reputable source. See UrbanDictionary. Jo7hs2 (talk) 21:28, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Neologisms must go. §FreeRangeFrog 22:53, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NEO and WP:NOT#DICT Tavix (talk) 23:11, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.