- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:20, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Obullo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
yet another "web application framework". Not notable. No independent sources - article created by the framework creator. Disputed prod. noq (talk) 16:50, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No notability demonstrated. A project of article creator which may one day be notable, but a google search doesn't find much other than chat amongst its developers. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 17:17, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:N. oyasumi (talk) 17:47, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I found zero significant coverage. SL93 (talk) 00:39, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:54, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The best source I could find is Best Lightweight PHP Frameworks of 2010 by some semi-blog, comparing maintained frameworks with the size not exceeding 1Mb. The rating of this software is 18/18. Definitely notable software... — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 20:41, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails to meet our N requirements.--Epeefleche (talk) 02:06, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.