Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Odoo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep. - MrX 23:27, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Odoo

Odoo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a non-notable CRM/ERM application suite. I am unable to find any meaningful sources beyond press release generated coverage and trivial mentions. Fails WP:GNG. - MrX 13:32, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Withdrawn by nominator- MrX 23:27, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:34, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Odoo is the new name of OpenERP (it is a redirection). A Google search gives more than 600k results for either Odoo or OpenERP, from thousands of sources (keep WP:NTEMP in mind). A search for books gives hundreds of books about OpenERP/Odoo. Google Trends shows the history of the project's name and popularity. More random examples: Odoo was recently selected in the top 5 project management tools for 2015 on opensource.com, in the Best Linux and Open Source Apps for the Enterprise in 2015 of linux.com, nominated for the Deloitte Technology Fast 50 2014. The product also won a BOSSIE Award two years in a row, under its former name, OpenERP, in 2012 and 2013. According to WP:NNC and WP:ARTN, the above should be sufficient to establish notability, even if the article contents itself should certainly be improved. As a comparison, here is what Google Trends says about popularity of OpenERP vs Openbravo. By that measure, the Openbravo article and a great many other ones would have to face deletion as well? Odony (talk) 09:29, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.