- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete as this is a dictionary entry rather than an encyclopedic subject per WP:NOTDICDEF. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:32, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Off task (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
A simple definition, original research - deleted yesterday anyway, and includes a talkpage full of bizarre (and in places violent) drivel, seemingly added by the IP of the article's creator. ╟─TreasuryTag►contribs─╢ 17:20, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:MADEUP Drawn Some (talk) 17:29, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, I'mperator 14:42, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Badly formed dictionary definition. Not made up one day, but still. --63.64.30.2 (talk) 17:34, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete on grounds that WP:NOTDICDEF. --Dlduncan2 (talk) 20:57, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as an unsourced dicdef without encyclopedic potential. No evidence this can be usefully expanded beyond its current state. ~ mazca t|c 16:31, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.