Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Officers' Association

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Owen× ☎ 16:48, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Officers' Association

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is a simple explanation for this business-related article's reliance on a single source. No other secondary sources exist. Kaptain Kebab Heart (talk) 14:33, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 15:07, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep no sign of any WP:BEFORE. There seem to be many reliable sources in the references. (A charity is not a business.) All the best: Rich Farmbrough 15:27, 10 March 2025 (UTC).[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:01, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There are a number of sources given in the references. What is meant by "a single source", the book of Mike Hally? BTW, having a single source only is not a valid reason for deletion, WP:ONESOURCE is just an essay. --Cyfal (talk) 21:35, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Not a business, plenty of sources and a very notable organisation. The nomination is incorrect on all counts. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:24, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Can't deny the fact that is has multiple references and looks like a very notable organizations. Meets WP:ORG. Gauravs 51 (talk) 04:04, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.