Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Official hijackers of the 2001 attacks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was article was boldly merged. Mailer Diablo 00:23, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

POV fork of Organizers of the September 11, 2001 attacks. The list of persons here is already listed and the title of this page is too POV. I already moved the page to a correctly spelled version as the first one had the word Official spelled as offical. Delete--MONGO 20:51, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Redundant to another article and contains conjecture. --StuffOfInterest 20:53, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. as redundant to Organizers of the September 11, 2001 attacks --Mmx1 20:55, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete redundant fork. feydey 21:02, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Upon looking through the Organizers of the September 11, 2001 attacks article, I think an article on the hijackers is redundant and not needed. --Aude (talk | contribs) 21:03, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge. Most of this article is redundant, but the "Wrongly accused" section could be merged into Organizers of the September 11, 2001 attacks. --mtz206 21:08, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete POV fork.--Isotope23 21:50, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as POV fork. Thatcher131 22:03, 30 March 2006 (UTC)Thatcher131 06:04, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete clearly a POV fork.--Jersey Devil 23:27, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge per mtz206, people need to learn what POV fork acctualy means, sine they cant distinguish one from a content fork --Striver 02:23, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete POV fork.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 02:34, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Redundant. Rhobite 03:42, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The notion that there is an "official" list implies that there are other lists, hence the title is POV. The subject of alternative interpretations of the hijacking is thoroughly covered in 9/11 conspiracy theories, and there is a link at Organizers of the September 11, 2001 attacks#Alternative accounts; hence the article is a redundant content fork. Thatcher131 06:04, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 01:23, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Since i created the article, i decided to go ahead and merge the article. Feel free to revert me if you dissagre. --Striver 11:10, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.